Riot and London. At first sight the words sit uneasily together, for traditionally London is a city known best for its order, civility and tolerance. Yet in a long history there is space for more than one tradition, and from time to time, every generation or so, rioting in London has challenged the forces of order and stretched them past breaking point. At times, too, London has seemed on the brink of civil war. The history of London’s riots reveals great differences between them. What possible similarity can there be between the August riots of 2011 and, say, the uproar attending the election campaigns and imprisonment of John Wilkes in 1768?

london riots 2011
London riots at Chalk Farm, Camden 2011
Certainly, not much at first sight, or even second, though both had some features in common (an element of organisation, for instance, and reckless violence against those seeking to quell the disturbances). But perhaps reflecting further on some of these troubled events, while giving just weight to the very specific triggers that led to rioting in the first place, can begin to unpick those structural features of London life that have caused its tradition of riot to endure over time, and make it likely to continue to do so.

I’ve chosen three events, one from each of the pervious centuries, to explore change and continuity in London’s tradition of riot. The first, by far the most serious, was the Gordon Riots of June 1780, with which the August 2011 disturbances were compared by some commentators. The second was the rioting in Hyde Park in June 1855 against a measure being considered by parliament that would have closed all shops in the metropolis on Sundays, the principal marketing day of the week for London’s poorest. And the third was the Brixton Disorders of 8-10 April 1981, an ‘uprising’, as some called it, of young people, mainly black, against oppressive policing tactics in a then-troubled part of south London.

The Gordon Riots of June 1780 really were a moment when London seemed plunged into civil war. They began out of many causes: economic, political and religious. Economically, wages had been overtaken by the cost of living for much of the 1770s, and the living standards of the poor were chronically depressed. Politically, the country was in the final throes of an unpopular and humiliating war with America, where defeat had followed defeat, and where the stock of a hated government was miserably low. There had been anti-government rioting in Downing Street and Whitehall at the beginning of 1779 for instance. Then, into an already flammable mix, was thrown the firebrand of religious intolerance. An Act to remove some disabilities from Roman Catholics in England had passed into law as a government measure in 1778. It had attracted no public hostility at the time. But in 1779 an attempt to extend its provisions to Scotland produced fierce anti-Catholic rioting in Glasgow and Edinburgh. And in London a Protestant Association was formed to begin a movement for the repeal of the Act in England. Its president was Lord George Gordon, 29 years old, a former naval lieutenant, MP for a Wiltshire constituency, third son of a Duke, and mad – at least, unhinged in matters of religion.

The Gordon Riots by Charles Green
When Gordon led marches presenting a petition to parliament in favour of repeal of the Catholic Relief Act he prompted a week of rioting in London. What set out as the destruction of Catholic chapels, and the firing and looting of prominent Catholics’ houses and businesses, turned in a few days to an all-out attack on the London system of justice: on the police offices at Bow Street and elsewhere; on the ‘spunging-houses’ run by bailiffs to lock up debtors; most of all on the prisons, both criminal and civil, the most loathed manifestations of power in London. Some 210 rioters were shot dead in the streets; another seventy-five or so died in the hospitals; unknown others dropped dead from drinking neat liquor looted from the distilleries or died at home from their wounds. It is said that the riots ‘destroyed ten times more property than was destroyed in Paris during the entire French Revolution.’

The events of 1855 seem pale in comparison. Again, though, it had been a troubled year. The economic dislocations of war and a steep rise in the price of provisions precipitated ‘bread riots’ in the East End in February 1855. ‘Mobs of boys and degraded women, under the guidance of stalwart ruffians or desperate Irishmen, paraded the streets and levied contributions.’ Some organisation led to disturbances in several places simultaneously. Bakers’ and chandlers’ shops plundered of bread and coal.

The summer saw more serious stuff. In June 1855 a Sunday Trading Bill introduced by Lord Robert Grosvenor was debated in parliament. Its object was to close shops and beer houses and to shut down public transport all in the name of sabbath observance. In the week before Sunday 24 June, printed bills from ‘A ratepayer of Walworth’ called ‘artizans, mechanics, and lower orders of the metropolis’ to Hyde Park ‘to see how religiously the aristocracy observe the Sabbath’. Along the carriage drives between the Serpentine and Kensington Gardens crowds assembled to hoot and hiss the phaetons of the rich and their sabbath-breaking servants. There were cries of ‘Go to Church!’ and horses were made to shy and bolt. For the next two Sundays, handbills and posters drew more protestors to the Park. On Sunday 1 July vast numbers, some said 150,000, turned up. Sticks, stones, clods of earth and horse dung were thrown and a noisy crowd clung deep along the rails of the carriageways.

It was not just the rich who were abused – ‘“Down with the Crushers!”’ was one cry reported in The Times, and there were running skirmishes between police and people. Bystanders, promenaders, peaceful demonstrators and ruffians were all swept indiscriminately into the melee. For a time some young guardsmen joined the tumult against ‘the crushers’ and when eventually they were marched off the crowd followed, stoning their escort and then their barracks until dispersed by a police charge. There was much violence on both sides. Forty-nine policemen were injured. And among the crowd were a number of well-dressed pickpockets and ‘other reckless and disorderly persons, bent on plunder and mischief’. The Sunday following there were further disturbances, including window-breaking in the West End and looting in shopping streets. Next day Lord Robert Grosvenor withdrew his Bill and the trouble slowly subsided.

The ‘crushers’, now going under different names, figured largely in the Brixton Disorders of 1981. That, too, was another troubled year. In January the dreadful ‘Deptford Fire’ at a party attended by young black people killed thirteen. The cause was almost certainly arson though no one was charged with the crime. Many thought it was a racist act, made worse by what seemed an inadequate investigation by the Metropolitan Police. A ‘Black People’s Day of Action’ in March led to some fighting between marchers and bystanders in central London. That April, the Special Patrol Group of the Met undertook – not for the first time – an operation against street crime in Lambeth. It was codenamed Swamp 81.

image of police barricade during the 1981 brixton riots
The Brixton Disorders of 1981
The Brixton Disorders were the most sustained and serious riots of the century in London. They were sparked by a PC attending a young black man who had been stabbed, but whom passers-by assumed had been beaten by the police. Within half an hour a riot had broken out with the police as its target. Next day, Saturday afternoon through the evening and night, 279 police and 45 members of the public were injured, 145 buildings damaged, 28 by fire. There was extensive looting. One in three of those arrested was white. That summer there were further anti-police riots in Lambeth, Southall, Wood Green, Dalston and in more than twenty other places in the capital.

What can these events, 200 years apart, tell us about the underpinning to London’s tradition of riot? Without ignoring the differences – which are great – I think they tell us something about the very nature of the place. For London is and always has been an unfairly-structured city. It promises the world to its citizens and flaunts daily what the richest among them can expect, what in reality few can obtain, and from which many are excluded altogether. The structures are maintained by a system of justice that always favours those who have over those who have not. From time to time this unfairness, and that system, become repugnant, occasionally intolerable. And when that happens some Londoners will erupt in fury, their first target those elements in the justice system which are in the front rank of protecting the very inequalities that are so grievously resented in their lives. However we interpret the events of August 2011, they surely tell us that this age-old strand in London life is likely to maintain its vigour for the foreseeable future.

London Riots Reading List

Bloom, Clive Violent London: 2000 Years of Riots, Rebels and Revolts, 2010

De Castro, J Paul The Gordon Riots, 1926

Goodway, David London Chartism, 1838-1848, 1982

Hibbert, Christopher King Mob. The Story of Lord George Gordon and the Riots of 1780, 1958

Linebaugh, Peter The London Hanged. Crime and Civil Society in the Eighteenth Century, 1991

Rudé, George Hanoverian London 1714-1808, 1971

Rudé, George Paris and London in the Eighteenth Century. Studies in Popular Protest, 1974

Thurston, Gavin The Clerkenwell Riot. The Killing of Constable Culley, 1967

White, Jerry London in the Nineteenth Century. A Human Awful Wonder of God, 2007

White, Jerry London in the Twentieth Century. A City and Its People, 2001

One Comment

  1. whats up

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *